Humanities and Arts
Evaluating Degrees of “Softness” in Therapeutic Systems of Knitted Wearable Technology with Brain Injury Survivors
rnfinity
Laura J Salisbury
Laura J Salisbury
Royal College of Art and the Helen Hamlyn Centre for Design.
Abstract
Wearable energy harvesting methods have been increasingly researched over the past decade. Due to demands for finding suitable ways of powering wearable devices suited to garment contexts, yarn-based “components” gather increasing interest. However, the focus of textile properties of energy harvesting components often place emphasis on functional performance and limited elements concerning wearability; using terms such as “flexible”, “breathable” and “wearable”. Rarely, is there consideration for degrees of “comfort”, and “softness”. Yet, if such methods are to become integrated into wearable garments and worn on a daily basis, or even in niche contexts, the tactile experience requires attention. To address this, the following research details an exploration of softness of a polyvinylidene fluoride (PVDF) yarn-based energy harvesting method, amongst brain injury survivors where degrees of sensitivity can vary to extremes; accruing either reduced or heightened levels of sensitivity as a result of stroke, for example. Levels of softness have been defined and quantified from earlier samples responded to by stroke survivors. This has been formed into a chart and used in reference within the development process to refine and detail the methods used to improve the quality of softness in the process of knitting. In contexts, such as the knit lab, participant presence can be limited, yet feedback, especially on subjective matters such as softness, is critical to the development process. The method presented of grading softness in accordance with previous samples is seen to aid the researcher to analyse samples made in situ, within an iterative process of development. The paper focuses on providing conversations around technical data within the knit process to deliver soft and wearable energy harvesting textiles. This forms a part of a wider body of PhD research that explores the use of piezoelectric theory as a technological tool for recovery of upper limb deficits for stroke survivors.
Key Questions
What is the focus of the study "Evaluating Degrees of 'Softness' in Therapeutic Systems of Knitted Wearable Technology with Brain Injury Survivors"?
The study focuses on evaluating how knitted wearable technology, specifically designed to aid brain injury survivors, can be enhanced by varying degrees of "softness" to provide effective therapeutic benefits. It explores the role of fabric properties in promoting comfort and rehabilitation.
Why is the concept of "softness" important in the development of therapeutic wearable technology?
Softness is crucial for therapeutic wearables as it directly affects the comfort and usability of the technology for individuals with brain injuries. The right degree of softness can improve the wearability of the device and support physical and emotional recovery during rehabilitation.
How does knitted wearable technology aid brain injury survivors?
Knitted wearable technology can aid brain injury survivors by providing gentle, adaptive support to areas of the body that require attention. These garments can promote muscle relaxation, provide sensory feedback, and help in managing neurological and physical symptoms commonly experienced by survivors.
What role does "softness" play in therapeutic outcomes for brain injury survivors?
The study highlights that different levels of softness in wearable materials can influence the effectiveness of the therapy by enhancing comfort and reducing skin irritation. These factors contribute to improved patient satisfaction, adherence to wearing the device, and overall therapeutic outcomes.
What were the key findings of the study on softness in knitted wearable technology?
The study found that a balance of softness in the materials used for knitted wearable technology is critical. Too soft or too firm materials may reduce the effectiveness of the therapeutic system. Properly engineered softness improves the device’s therapeutic properties and enhances user comfort.
How do brain injury survivors respond to knitted wearable technology in terms of comfort?
Survivors of brain injuries typically respond positively to knitted wearable technology that balances softness and support. Comfort is paramount, and those who find the wearable comfortable are more likely to consistently use it, which in turn increases the potential therapeutic benefits.
What implications do the findings of this study have for the future design of wearable technology for therapeutic purposes?
The findings suggest that wearable technology for therapeutic purposes should consider not only functional and supportive features but also the softness of the materials used. This will help improve the long-term use and comfort for users, particularly in the rehabilitation of brain injury survivors.
What is the significance of user feedback in improving the design of wearable technology for therapy?
User feedback is invaluable in the design process of wearable technology, especially for therapy. Direct input from brain injury survivors ensures that the wearable meets their comfort and therapeutic needs. This can drive innovations in design and function, improving overall recovery experiences.
How can designers incorporate the concept of softness into future therapeutic wearables?
Designers can incorporate softness by using advanced textiles and materials that provide variable degrees of softness depending on the wearer’s needs. Techniques such as knitting and integrating stretchable fabrics can allow for dynamic changes in softness, ensuring comfort during extended use and therapy.
What are the potential challenges in creating therapeutic knitted wearables for brain injury survivors?
Challenges include ensuring durability, ease of maintenance, and the proper fit of the garment. Achieving an ideal balance between softness, support, and comfort while maintaining therapeutic efficacy requires careful design and material selection. Moreover, addressing individual preferences and needs can be complex.
