RNfinity
Research Infinity Logo, Orange eye of horus, white eye of Ra
  • Home
  • Submit
    Research Articles
    Ebooks
  • Articles
    Academic
    Ebooks
  • Info
    Home
    Subject
    Submit
    About
    News
    Submission Guide
    Contact Us
    Personality Tests
  • Login/sign up
    Login
    Register

Humanities and Arts

From Garrisoned District to Chinese Town: Land and Boundaries at the Kowloon Walled City, 1898–1912

rnfinity

info@rnfinity.com

Y. L. Lucy Wang

Y. L. Lucy Wang

Department of Art History and Archaeology, Columbia University, US

yw3056@columbia.edu


copyright icon

© attribution CC-BY

  • 0

rating
2004 Views

Added on

2022-05-09

Doi: https://doi.org/10.16995/ah.8292

Related Subjects
History
Music
Language
Philosophy
Classics
Art

Abstract

The Kowloon Walled City in Hong Kong became a named entity around 1810 and was demolished in 1994, but its architecture had long been unclassified. Not until the years just prior to its demolition did this dense slum of informal multi-story buildings receive sustained attention from architects and architectural historians. However, the architectural nature of the six-acre area predated its late-20th-century state. After its founding as a Qing military outpost, it underwent various structural additions and renovations, including an imperial Chinese administrative complex known as a yamen [衙門] and an outer wall, after which the Walled City was named. Against the grain of scholarship that has focused on the Walled City’s postwar, informal architecture, this article considers the site’s early years, arguing that the Walled City’s yamen and outer wall played a crucial role in the region’s land management practices. These two architectural structures make legible the Walled City’s evolution from a Qing administrative zone to a crowded slum. The Convention of 1898 ushered in a British-led land surveying effort throughout the New Territories region of Hong Kong, followed by the creation of an intricate bureaucracy for managing land lots. This clash of empires saw the use of two forms of land knowledge, Qing land deeds and British cadastral land surveys. In between these systems existed the Walled City, its inhabitation falling outside the British conception of land division but its historical contours very much shaped by the architectural boundaries that gave it its name.

Key Questions

Copy

What was the Kowloon Walled City, and why is it significant?

The Kowloon Walled City was a densely populated area in Hong Kong that originated as a Qing military outpost in the early 19th century. It became infamous as a lawless slum before its demolition in 1994. Its significance lies in its unique architectural evolution and its role in the clash between Qing and British land management systems.

How did the Kowloon Walled City evolve from a military outpost to a slum?

The Walled City began as a Qing military garrison with an administrative complex (yamen) and an outer wall. Over time, it transitioned into a densely populated urban area, losing its formal administrative role and becoming an informal settlement characterized by unregulated multi-story buildings.

What role did the yamen and outer wall play in the Walled City’s history?

The yamen and outer wall were central to the Walled City’s identity and function. They symbolized Qing authority and land management practices. Even as the area transformed into a slum, these structures remained key markers of its historical and architectural legacy.

How did the Convention of 1898 impact the Kowloon Walled City?

The Convention of 1898, which leased the New Territories to Britain, led to British-led land surveys and the establishment of a cadastral system. However, the Walled City’s unique status and architectural boundaries placed it outside British land division practices, creating a contested space between Qing and British systems.

What were the two forms of land knowledge used in the region?

The region saw the coexistence of Qing land deeds, which reflected traditional Chinese land management, and British cadastral surveys, which introduced Western methods of land division. The Walled City existed at the intersection of these systems, embodying the clash of empires.

Why did the Kowloon Walled City fall outside British land management practices?

The Walled City’s historical and architectural boundaries, rooted in Qing administration, did not align with British conceptions of land division. Its unique status as a former Qing outpost made it a liminal space that resisted British bureaucratic control.

How does the article challenge existing scholarship on the Kowloon Walled City?

The article shifts focus from the Walled City’s postwar informal architecture to its early years, emphasizing the role of the yamen and outer wall in shaping its evolution. It highlights the importance of architectural boundaries in understanding the site’s history.

What does the Walled City’s transformation reveal about land management in Hong Kong?

The Walled City’s transformation reflects the complexities of land management in Hong Kong during the colonial era. It illustrates the tension between traditional Qing practices and British colonial systems, as well as the challenges of governing a contested space.

What is the significance of the Walled City’s architectural boundaries?

The architectural boundaries, particularly the yamen and outer wall, were crucial in defining the Walled City’s identity and evolution. They served as physical and symbolic markers of its transition from a Qing administrative zone to a densely populated urban area.

How does the article contribute to the understanding of Hong Kong’s colonial history?

The article provides a nuanced perspective on Hong Kong’s colonial history by examining the Walled City as a site of cultural and administrative conflict. It highlights the interplay between architecture, land management, and imperial power in shaping the region’s development.

Summary Video Not Available

Review 0

Login

ARTICLE USAGE


Article usage: May-2022 to May-2025
Show by month Manuscript Video Summary
2025 May 148 148
2025 April 96 96
2025 March 94 94
2025 February 72 72
2025 January 73 73
2024 December 73 73
2024 November 74 74
2024 October 66 66
2024 September 69 69
2024 August 56 56
2024 July 60 60
2024 June 47 47
2024 May 57 57
2024 April 70 70
2024 March 76 76
2024 February 48 48
2024 January 49 49
2023 December 50 50
2023 November 56 56
2023 October 35 35
2023 September 28 28
2023 August 20 20
2023 July 35 35
2023 June 25 25
2023 May 35 35
2023 April 40 40
2023 March 43 43
2023 February 2 2
2023 January 1 1
2022 December 22 22
2022 November 59 59
2022 October 52 52
2022 September 29 29
2022 August 53 53
2022 July 56 56
2022 June 96 96
2022 May 39 39
Total 2004 2004
Show by month Manuscript Video Summary
2025 May 148 148
2025 April 96 96
2025 March 94 94
2025 February 72 72
2025 January 73 73
2024 December 73 73
2024 November 74 74
2024 October 66 66
2024 September 69 69
2024 August 56 56
2024 July 60 60
2024 June 47 47
2024 May 57 57
2024 April 70 70
2024 March 76 76
2024 February 48 48
2024 January 49 49
2023 December 50 50
2023 November 56 56
2023 October 35 35
2023 September 28 28
2023 August 20 20
2023 July 35 35
2023 June 25 25
2023 May 35 35
2023 April 40 40
2023 March 43 43
2023 February 2 2
2023 January 1 1
2022 December 22 22
2022 November 59 59
2022 October 52 52
2022 September 29 29
2022 August 53 53
2022 July 56 56
2022 June 96 96
2022 May 39 39
Total 2004 2004
Related Subjects
History
Music
Language
Philosophy
Classics
Art
copyright icon

© attribution CC-BY

  • 0

rating
2004 Views

Added on

2022-05-09

Doi: https://doi.org/10.16995/ah.8292

Related Subjects
History
Music
Language
Philosophy
Classics
Art

Follow Us

  • Xicon
  • Contact Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms and Conditions

5 Braemore Court, London EN4 0AE, Telephone +442082758777

© Copyright 2025 All Rights Reserved.