RNfinity
Research Infinity Logo, Orange eye of horus, white eye of Ra
  • Home
  • Submit
    Research Articles
    Ebooks
  • Articles
    Academic
    Ebooks
  • Info
    Home
    Subject
    Submit
    About
    News
    Submission Guide
    Contact Us
    Personality Tests
  • Login/sign up
    Login
    Register

Biomedical

Effects of PET image reconstruction parameters and tumor-to-background uptake ratio on quantification of PET images from PET/MRI and PET/CT systems

rnfinity

info@rnfinity.com

orcid logo

Amena Ali Hussain,

Amena Ali Hussain

NULL


Eva Forssell-Aronsson,

Eva Forssell-Aronsson

NULL


Tobias Rosholm,

Tobias Rosholm

NULL


Esmaeil Mehrara

Esmaeil Mehrara

NULL


  Peer Reviewed

copyright icon

© attribution CC-BY

  • 0

rating
486 Views

Added on

2024-09-30

Doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.15392/2319-0612.2024.2487

Abstract

PET/CT and PET/MRI are valuable multimodality imaging techniques for visualizing both functional and anatomical information. The most used PET reconstruction algorithm is Ordered Subset Expectation Maximization (OSEM). In OSEM, the image noise increases with increased number of iterations, and the reconstruction needs to be stopped before complete convergence. The Bayesian penalized likelihood (BPL) algorithm, recently introduced, uses a noise penalty factor (β) to achieve full convergence while controlling noise. This study aims to evaluate how reconstruction algorithms and lesion radioactivity levels affect PET image quality and quantitative accuracy across three different PET systems. Materials and Methods: A NEMA phantom was filled with 18F and scanned by one PET/MRI and two PET/CT systems with sphere-to-background concentration ratio (SBR) of 2:1, 4:1, or 10:1. PET images were reconstructed with OSEM or BPL with TOF. The number of iterations and β-values were varied, while the matrix size, number of subsets, and filter size remained constant. Contrast recovery (CR) and background variability (BV) were measured in images. Results: CR increased with increased sphere size and SBR. CR and BV decreased with increased β for the 10mm sphere. Increased number of iterations in OSEM showed increased BV with limited variation in CR. BPL gave higher CR and lower BV values than OSEM. The optimal reconstruction was BPL with β between 150 and 350, where BPL was available, and OSEM with two iterations and 21 subsets for the PET/CT without BPL. Conclusion: BPL outperforms OSEM, and SBR significantly influences tracer uptake quantification in small lesions. Future studies should explore the clinical implications of these findings on diagnosis, staging, prognosis, and treatment follow-up.

Key Questions

What is the primary objective of this study?

The study aims to evaluate how different PET image reconstruction parameters and varying tumor-to-background uptake ratios affect the quantification accuracy of PET images obtained from PET/MRI and PET/CT systems.

What methodology was employed in the research?

A NEMA phantom was filled with 18F and scanned using one PET/MRI and two PET/CT systems with sphere-to-background concentration ratios (SBR) of 2:1, 4:1, and 10:1. PET images were reconstructed using Ordered Subset Expectation Maximization (OSEM) or Bayesian Penalized Likelihood (BPL) algorithms with Time-of-Flight (TOF) information.

What were the key findings of the study?

The study found that both the choice of reconstruction algorithm and the tumor-to-background uptake ratio significantly influence the quantification of PET images. The specific impacts of these parameters on image quality and quantification accuracy were analyzed and discussed in detail.

What are the implications of these findings for clinical practice?

Understanding the effects of reconstruction parameters and uptake ratios can aid in optimizing PET imaging protocols, potentially leading to more accurate tumor assessments and improved patient management in clinical settings.

Where can the full article be accessed?

The full article is available in the Brazilian Journal of Radiation Sciences, Volume 12, Number 3, 2024, and can be accessed online at: Brazilian Journal of Radiation Sciences: Volume 12(3), Article 2487

Summary Video Not Available

Review 0

Login

ARTICLE USAGE


Article usage: Sep-2024 to Jun-2025
Show by month Manuscript Video Summary
2025 June 97 97
2025 May 87 87
2025 April 52 52
2025 March 56 56
2025 February 48 48
2025 January 48 48
2024 December 39 39
2024 November 39 39
2024 October 20 20
Total 486 486
Show by month Manuscript Video Summary
2025 June 97 97
2025 May 87 87
2025 April 52 52
2025 March 56 56
2025 February 48 48
2025 January 48 48
2024 December 39 39
2024 November 39 39
2024 October 20 20
Total 486 486
Related Subjects
Anatomy
Biochemistry
Epidemiology
Genetics
Neuroscience
Psychology
Oncology
Medicine
Musculoskeletal science
Pediatrics
Pathology
Pharmacology
Physiology
Psychiatry
Primary care
Women and reproductive health
copyright icon

© attribution CC-BY

  • 0

rating
486 Views

Added on

2024-09-30

Doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.15392/2319-0612.2024.2487

Related Subjects
Anatomy
Biochemistry
Epidemiology
Genetics
Neuroscience
Psychology
Oncology
Medicine
Musculoskeletal science
Pediatrics
Pathology
Pharmacology
Physiology
Psychiatry
Primary care
Women and reproductive health

Follow Us

  • Xicon
  • Contact Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms and Conditions

5 Braemore Court, London EN4 0AE, Telephone +442082758777

© Copyright 2025 All Rights Reserved.